Welfare and amnesty

Jesús Tejeda 

ID 132245

Comportamiento político 

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2013/05/immigration-reform

Economist Milton Friedman said the United States cannot have its border open and social welfare cannot be very large, it cannot reach all the people including those who are illegally in the country. Says it is unfair to the majority of the American people if applied this decree, in addition to further encourage immigration in the future.

In a conference call what is America? About open borders and the welfare state. Friedman warned that illegal people are in the United States there are two types of cases: the first is that you can have a job illegally and the second is to have free immigration to welfare state, but argues that you can have both.

Illegal immigration from a favorable view may be because you can immigrate to more jobs and immigrants are ineligible for most payments or transfers made by the government therefore must migrate to more jobs.

What you are looking to immigration reform is not illegal people cost you much money to the government, and that in the future these people will enjoy the benefits offered by the U.S. government such as Social Security, Medicare and Obamacare. DeMint Rector and argue that illegal immigrants impose costs as the police, hospitals, schools and other services. The call money they receive free money, because as they are illegally in the country, cannot do operations as do most Americans.

But later they were questioned these actors, Tim Kane argues that these actors do not pay attention to the economic benefit that spills over the profits from illegal people. The author says that immigrants have made important contributions to GDP. Others say that to carry out immigration reform in the United States expects growth PIB. The positions with the authors on the topic of immigration reform are not very clear, because they offer a study that demonstrated that they could be more that earnings losses for the economy of this States.

In Reading Public Opinion Susan Herbst says the concept of the public is malleable concepts, in relation to Article several specialists talk about implementing immigration reform, have several positions on the issue. Some say it is good for the U.S. economy and others over the years can cost more than the U.S. government, and they would enjoy the benefits of a citizen legally established.

During the construction process of the public is of vital importance in democratic theory and in practice, that is, according to the positions that are generated can further questioning immigration reform. In conclusion, we can say that is an issue that has to be analyzed thoroughly, it is important for the United States and to Mexico. First, we have to do different studies really show whether aid or affect the U.S. economy.